Posted - 09/27/2017 Comfort With Discomfort
Building the capacity for relational engagement on climate change between scientists and communities
by Faith Kearns and Clare Gupta
Climate change is an emotional issue. It can be scary as a scientist to come up against that kind of emotion – whether your own or other people’s – when you’ve spent your career trying to remove feelings from your work, as most scientists are trained to do. At the same time, being uncomfortable with emotions can be a serious limitation when trying to engage effectively with others on contentious issues like climate change.
Now, more than ever, the science community is invited to develop new ways of engaging with individuals and communities on contentious issues like climate change. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that it is not enough to rely on scientific and technical information, expertise, and authority alone to compel social action on climate change. Instead, we are seeing transformation occur as diverse groups of people work together to affect change, often in seemingly messy and chaotic ways that include contributions from the climate justice, artistic, and activist communities and at every level from local to international.
Shifting climate work into this kind of relational mode—one centered on people and how we relate with each other and our environment—is in many ways a sea change in how the scientific community has dealt with an issue traditionally steeped in technical intricacy and governmental hierarchy. Learning to effectively engage in this environment calls for significant interpersonal and emotional skills. Yet, scientists are primarily trained to deal in objectivity and facts, and to push away subjective views, conflict, and feelings.
How do we support scientists in learning to feel more comfortable with discomfort? In other fields, including law, medicine, and psychology, a shift into relationship-centered work has been one answer to similar challenges, and has been ongoing for at least the past two decades.
A common thread among these fields is a shift from expert-driven to more collaborative modes of working together. Navigating the personal and emotional elements of relational work asks quite a bit more of practitioners than subject-matter expertise. In medicine, for example, relationship-centered care is a framework examining how relationships—between patients and clinicians, among clinicians, and with broader communities—impact health care. It recognizes that care may go well beyond technical competency, and that capacities including empathy, compassion, and ability to be with difficult emotions are valuable.
For our pause, we gathered a group of scientists together with experts in relational work in law, medicine, and psychology for a unique, co-learning experience. This is a group of people that would likely not interact under other circumstances. The pause gave us time to explore new, innovative ideas in a way that we are rarely able to get the time or support for. The gathering built on a related 2016 workshop supported by The Whitman Institute.
Our first goal for our pause was simply to model the change that we’d like to see. The gathering gave everyone a chance to focus on developing relationships within the group and see what emerged. A combination of formal and informal activities encouraged sharing and reflection. Our second goal was to advance the groundwork for a new plan of action for helping scientists within the University of California’s cooperative extension system who do direct work with communities on climate change build the capacity to effectively navigate contentious, emotional situations and relationships.
In our next post, we will discuss a bit more about what we learned from each other and our plans for taking our “aha” moments out into the world.
Participants:
Allison, Elizabeth Associate Professor, California Institute for Integral Studies
Davenport, Leslie Author, Emotional Resiliency in the Era of Climate Change
Gupta, Clare Assistant Specialist, Department of Human Ecology, UC Davis
Kearns, Faith Academic Coordinator, UC Division of Ag and Natural Resources
Kocher, Susie Forestry and Natural Resource Advisor, UC Division of Ag and Natural Resources
McMullin, Juliet Professor, School of Medicine, UC Riverside
Silverstein, Gail Clinical Professor of Law, UC Hastings School of Law
Smith, Martin Cooperative Extension Specialist, UC Davis
Sowerwine, Jennifer Cooperative Extension Specialist, UC Berkeley
Stark, Dan Staff Research Associate, UC Division of Ag and Natural Resources
by Faith Kearns and Clare Gupta
Participants gathered at Mayacamas Ranch in northern California for an interdisciplinary pause. Photo by Faith Kearns |
Climate change is an emotional issue. It can be scary as a scientist to come up against that kind of emotion – whether your own or other people’s – when you’ve spent your career trying to remove feelings from your work, as most scientists are trained to do. At the same time, being uncomfortable with emotions can be a serious limitation when trying to engage effectively with others on contentious issues like climate change.
Now, more than ever, the science community is invited to develop new ways of engaging with individuals and communities on contentious issues like climate change. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that it is not enough to rely on scientific and technical information, expertise, and authority alone to compel social action on climate change. Instead, we are seeing transformation occur as diverse groups of people work together to affect change, often in seemingly messy and chaotic ways that include contributions from the climate justice, artistic, and activist communities and at every level from local to international.
Shifting climate work into this kind of relational mode—one centered on people and how we relate with each other and our environment—is in many ways a sea change in how the scientific community has dealt with an issue traditionally steeped in technical intricacy and governmental hierarchy. Learning to effectively engage in this environment calls for significant interpersonal and emotional skills. Yet, scientists are primarily trained to deal in objectivity and facts, and to push away subjective views, conflict, and feelings.
How do we support scientists in learning to feel more comfortable with discomfort? In other fields, including law, medicine, and psychology, a shift into relationship-centered work has been one answer to similar challenges, and has been ongoing for at least the past two decades.
A common thread among these fields is a shift from expert-driven to more collaborative modes of working together. Navigating the personal and emotional elements of relational work asks quite a bit more of practitioners than subject-matter expertise. In medicine, for example, relationship-centered care is a framework examining how relationships—between patients and clinicians, among clinicians, and with broader communities—impact health care. It recognizes that care may go well beyond technical competency, and that capacities including empathy, compassion, and ability to be with difficult emotions are valuable.
For our pause, we gathered a group of scientists together with experts in relational work in law, medicine, and psychology for a unique, co-learning experience. This is a group of people that would likely not interact under other circumstances. The pause gave us time to explore new, innovative ideas in a way that we are rarely able to get the time or support for. The gathering built on a related 2016 workshop supported by The Whitman Institute.
Our first goal for our pause was simply to model the change that we’d like to see. The gathering gave everyone a chance to focus on developing relationships within the group and see what emerged. A combination of formal and informal activities encouraged sharing and reflection. Our second goal was to advance the groundwork for a new plan of action for helping scientists within the University of California’s cooperative extension system who do direct work with communities on climate change build the capacity to effectively navigate contentious, emotional situations and relationships.
In our next post, we will discuss a bit more about what we learned from each other and our plans for taking our “aha” moments out into the world.
Participants:
Allison, Elizabeth Associate Professor, California Institute for Integral Studies
Davenport, Leslie Author, Emotional Resiliency in the Era of Climate Change
Gupta, Clare Assistant Specialist, Department of Human Ecology, UC Davis
Kearns, Faith Academic Coordinator, UC Division of Ag and Natural Resources
Kocher, Susie Forestry and Natural Resource Advisor, UC Division of Ag and Natural Resources
McMullin, Juliet Professor, School of Medicine, UC Riverside
Silverstein, Gail Clinical Professor of Law, UC Hastings School of Law
Smith, Martin Cooperative Extension Specialist, UC Davis
Sowerwine, Jennifer Cooperative Extension Specialist, UC Berkeley
Stark, Dan Staff Research Associate, UC Division of Ag and Natural Resources
Categories
- All
- #ZeroBy2050
- 10Power
- 350 Seattle
- 36.5
- ANHE
- ARC-KE:i
- Al Gore
- Alicia Escott
- American Resilience Project
- Anjali Nayar
- Anthony Myint
- As You Sow
- At the Water's Edge
- Bard Center for Environmental Policy
- Beka Economopoulos
- Biomimicry Collaborative
- Bioneers
- Black Permaculture Network
- Blossoming Possibilities
- Blue Heart Labs
- Bodhi Garrett
- Britta Riley
- Bureau of Linguistical Reality
- C2C(Change 2 Climate)
- CELI
- COP21
- COP22
- California Foodways
- California Institute for Rural Studies
- Carbon Shock
- Casey Beck
- Catalogue of Extinct Experience
- Cathedral of St. John the Divine
- Center for Investigative Reporting
- Change the Bulb
- Chris Desser
- CityLab7
- Clean Energy Leadership Institute
- Climate Change
- Climate Science Alliance
- Climate Solutions Group
- CoClimate
- Convening 2010
- Coronavirus
- Council of Pronghorn
- Daily Acts
- Dancing Earth
- Dancing Without Borders
- Dr. Renee Lertzman
- Dream Rider Productions
- DreamRider Productions
- Duke University
- E2
- Earth Guardians
- Earthseed Consulting
- Eban Goodstein
- Eve Mosher
- Faith Kearns
- GAIA
- Gary Nabhan
- General
- Global Climate Action Summit
- Grant Partner Gathering
- Grant Partner Spotlight
- Grant Partners
- Grant Proposal Application
- Grants
- Happening
- Heidi Quante
- HighWaterLine
- Human Impacts Institute
- Impact Experience
- Impact Hours
- Invoking the Pause
- Joshua Fouts
- KALW
- KQED
- Kelly McVicker
- Kiss The Ground
- Libby Modern
- Lien Tran
- Lindley Mease
- Lisa Micheli
- Lisa Morehouse
- Magalie Bonneau
- Maggie Kaplan
- Mark Hertsgaard
- Mark Schapiro
- McDonalds
- Monica Wilson
- Morgan Curtis
- Natural History Museum
- Newsweek
- Nicole Heller
- Nicole Lederer
- Nina Simons
- Nina Wise
- Optimist Daily
- Pandora Thomas
- Paris COP21
- Pepperwood Preserve
- Peter Cunningham
- Planet Protector Academy
- Planet Protectors
- Post Pause
- Power Shift Network
- Presidio Graduate School
- Psych Alive
- Rainforest Connection
- Rebecca Patton
- Reinhard Hohlwein
- Rulan Tangen
- SPM3
- Sandra Kwak
- Sarah Cameron Sunde
- Science House Foundation
- Seeding Possibilities
- Seeds of Resistance
- Starbucks
- Stephen Antupit
- Sun Valley Forum
- SustainUS
- TIMBY
- Taco Diplomacy
- Tara DePorte
- Tensorflow
- Terry Tempest Williams
- The Arctic Cycle
- The Natural History Museum
- The Optimist Daily
- The Organic Life
- The Perennial
- The Redford Center
- Topher White
- Transition US
- Trathen Heckman
- Tribal Changes App
- University of Miami
- Videos
- Village Green(er)
- Wildlife Conservation Network
- Windowfarms
- Winters Past
- Works on Water
- World Business Academy
- XSproject
- Xi Martinez
- Zero Foodprint
- invoking the Pause